Taxes in Arlington
Arlington offers locational advantages for a corporation considering a
relocation to or expansion to office space in the Washington region in terms of tax savings. RCLCO (Robert Charles Lesser & Co. was retained by Arlington Economic Development to
conduct a study that compares the impact of taxation and other occupancy costs for office
tenants in specific Washington area submarkets. The analysis evaluated the relative
costs associated with a prospective tenant choosing an office location in Arlington
submarkets (Rosslyn, Crystal City, R-B Corridor) compared to office submarkets in Tyson's
Corner, Washington D.C. (Downtown, NOMA, Golden Triangle and Capitol Riverfront) and
Maryland (Bethesda, Rockville and Silver Spring).
RCLCO examined the full range of state
and local tax structures to understand which elements of the various tax codes would
apply to the office occupancy of a business. In addition they also evaluated Class A
rents and expenses that are typically included in a full-service lease, such as
utilities, property insurance and operating expenses. Costs were analyzed for three
“typical” prospective tenants: a corporation, a non-profit association and a federal
agency.
The results of the cost comparison indicate that all Arlington submarkets are more
affordable than the District for corporations, associations and federal agencies. On
average, a downtown D.C. location is 34% more expensive for a typical corporate tenant
and 39% more expensive for a nonprofit association or federal agency than Arlington. The
cost of locating in the emerging office submarkets of NOMA and Capitol Riverfront is 14%
to 16% higher.
Arlington’s competitive position with the office submarket of Tyson's Corner and Maryland
submarkets is mixed. As an office location, Arlington is less affordable than the
suburban locations of Rockville and Silver Spring. However, Rosslyn, the most expensive
submarket in Arlington, is less affordable than Tyson’s Corner and Bethesda. Crystal
City and Other R-B Corridor submarkets are more affordable as office locations.
A further examination of the two major categories of costs – 1) costs typically included
in a full-service lease and 2) costs paid directly by tenants – provides insights into
how tax structures affect types of users and why merely comparing tax rates does not
provide a complete picture of the full tenant cost burden across jurisdictions. For
example, Arlington corporations must pay personal property and gross receipts taxes, and
Maryland corporations pay neither of these taxes. However, income taxes – which are
required in both jurisdictions – are much higher in Maryland than in Virginia resulting
in a slightly higher total cost for Maryland corporations. Costs paid directly by
corporations in the District are substantially higher than in Virginia or Maryland
jurisdictions. Tyson's Corner has the lowest costs paid directly by corporation tenants
among all submarkets in this analysis.
For nonprofit associations, direct tenant costs are more affordable in the District
primarily because they are exempt from personal property tax in the district, but must
pay this tax in Virginia and Maryland.
For more information on taxes in Arlington, including information on tax payments, contact Arlington's Commissioner of the Revenue
|